“You're not just coding with AI.
You're working through it.”
Modern software engineering no longer runs purely on syntax and logic - it runs on communication. And that communication now flows in two directions: human-to-human, and human-to-AI. If you're not fluent in both, you're leaving your team open to friction, misalignment, and preventable failure.
Communication skills vary by intent (emotional vs. functional) and target (human vs. AI). This quadrant maps the new communication demands engineers must master.
In this hybrid workflow, engineers are more than just builders. You've become the interface - translating messy product intent into structured prompts, interpreting AI outputs, and aligning the whole mess with human goals.
Prompt engineering isn't guessing. It's clarity under constraint.
Think of it like writing an API spec for a non-human collaborator. The AI doesn't know your system, your domain model, or your priorities. So if you want reliable results, you have to specify exactly what's needed - goal, context, constraints, and all.
Compare these two prompts:
Bad:
“Write a function for users.”
Better:
“Write a Python function calculate_discounted_price(original_price, discount_percentage) that takes a float original_price and an integer discount_percentage (0–100) and returns the final price after applying the discount. Cap discounts over 100% at 100 and treat negatives as 0.”
The difference? The second prompt reflects the kind of clarity you'd give a teammate - if that teammate couldn't ask follow-up questions.
Great prompt engineering comes from the same skills that make you a great reviewer or lead: the ability to articulate what matters and why. This is communication at a technical level, not just a language one.
AI tools generate solutions for you - but you're often the one who has to explain them to others.
Maybe it's a PM wondering why the AI's suggested data model doesn't match user needs. Maybe it's a non-technical stakeholder who needs to understand why an AI-generated recommendation violates privacy policy. Maybe it's QA asking why an auto-generated test suite skipped a high-risk edge case.
This isn't about “dumbing it down.” It's about mapping machine logic to human context - business goals, team culture, user expectations. The ability to bridge that gap is no longer a nice-to-have. It's what ensures decisions are understood, aligned, and actionable.
Poor translation leads to missed priorities, rework, and eroded stakeholder trust. Effective translation? That's how engineering earns strategic credibility.
Empathy helps you see around corners. It's how you anticipate how something will be used - or misused. It's the skill that lets you catch a tone mismatch in an AI-generated prompt, or sense that a junior dev doesn't fully trust the tool you've just introduced.
But empathy isn't just interpersonal. It's architectural.
Empathetic engineers build more robust systems because they think about how real users behave - not just ideal ones. They ask:
Empathy scales code quality. It prevents technical debt by surfacing assumptions early. It improves user experience by catching mismatches between intent and delivery. In AI-heavy workflows, it's how you protect against building software that's “correct” but completely wrong for real people.
The old model was simple: break down the work, divide the tickets, ship the code. Now? Collaboration also means:
Your team rituals need to evolve. Standups should include blockers around tooling. Design reviews should ask not just what was built, but who (or what) built it. Retros need space to reflect on process trust - especially when AI creates false confidence.
Each stage builds AI awareness into existing team rituals - from standups to retrospectives - creating a repeatable process for alignment, oversight, and trust.
Clear communication and empathy aren't “soft skills.” They're collaboration protocols in a world where half your output is machine-assisted and all of it is still human-accountable.
You're not just writing code anymore. You're guiding systems. You're shaping tools. You're interpreting logic for humans and translating human goals into machine action.
You're not just working with AI.
You're working through it - every time you prompt, review, explain, or align.
That's what makes you irreplaceable.
Next up: Beyond the Feature - How Business Acumen and Ethical Leadership Shape the Future of Engineering. Clean code isn't enough. In the next post, we'll explore how engineers who understand business drivers and ethical trade-offs don't just build software - they help define what gets built in the first place.
This is part 3 of our 5-part series on Skills Beyond Code in the Era of AI:
Utterskills - We are an e-learning academy for IT-professionals and provide micro learning video courses for all relevant topics beyond code in IT-careers. Did you like this article? Then you're gonna love our videos! Why don't you give it a try? It's free!
TRY FOR FREE